Saturday, December 20, 2008

The hypocrisy of caste

When Arjun Singh announced the increase in reservations for OBCs to 27% in educational institutes like IIMs, IITs etc.; it created a furore. People were angry; some joined Youth for Equality protesting the politically motivated divisive policy of the UPA government while some premier institutes like AIIMS held demonstrations against reservations. I was amongst them who were against this increase based on the 1931 census. I didn’t like it when the policy was given a green signal minus the creamy layer in April 2008 as I wasn’t sure how the “creamy layer” would be excluded. On top of that the government in its order on 13th October 2008 raised the income criterion from Rs. 2,50,000 to Rs. 4,50,000. It is mainly these creamy layers who continually benefit from the reservations and the poor oppressed lower caste people remain so. The Supreme Court had observed, “Reservation cannot be permanent and appear to perpetuate backwardness.” A few days ago, the apex court asked the government to explain the change in criterion, which virtually excludes everyone from the creamy layer and defeats its earlier ruling. But there is something else that also frets me in this issue.

During the protests I saw many people saying things like “Reservations should be banned”, “Caste system should be eradicated from the society”, “Only meritocracy should be followed”. While some might be genuinely espousing these thoughts, I really wonder how many of these people actually follow their words in totality. You would find the same people who say these words following casteism in their personal lives.

In Mumbai there are colleges having quotas for north Indians, south Indians, sindhis, gujratis, muslims, etc. When the Indian Constitution supports reservations for lower castes, it can be questioned; then why not when it supports linguistic minority based quotas in educational insititutes. At least reservations based on caste hold some weight that they have been oppressed for hundreds of years but what weight do linguistic quotas hold? Surely they haven’t been underprivileged! People who say that reservations should be banned when it’s given to the OBCs also willingly take admissions in these colleges with the help of reservations based on linguistic quotas!

Caste system still exists in the Indian society because people make it alive. Even today there are many parents who wouldn’t allow their children to be married to a lower caste. Some might not believe in the caste system from their heart but would give in to the demands of the society. It is especially difficult for families of upper caste women to accept inter-caste marriages. While one should pay heed to what the public may say about you, there are certain issues where one should be willing take a bold stand. Although the instances of inter-caste marriages are seen more now, they are still few and are between and it is still widely seen as a taboo today. This phenomenon exists not only in rural India but also in the urban society, which can be seen from the matrimonial columns which are sectored on the basis of caste. Even today many urban youth have prejudices against the so-called ‘lower caste mentality’ and would never think of marrying them. They even join the communities of their caste on orkut. The same people who said that caste system should be eradicated when it came to reservations for OBCs!

Sheer Hypocrisy! The caste system is bad when it is against you and it is fine to follow it when it favours you! It is fashionable to be anti-reservations and make the aforementioned statements but it is a different thing altogether to practise it in your life.

The western world criticize Hinduism for the caste system which is unfair because the Vedas subscribe to caste system based only on deeds and occupation and not by birth. Also there have been only few cursory references of castes in the Vedas. However it is a reality today that Hinduism is contaminated with gross misinterpretation of the caste system based on birth. There were Hindu reformist organizations setup like Arya Samaj and Brahmo Samaj who denounced totally the caste based discrimination. More such efforts are required to get rid of this social evil.

There are those who feel that the current caste system must be eradicated by practising caste by occupation. But even if interpreted by occupation and not by birth, the issue of hierarchy in the caste system would not go. In a recent news, it was said that RSS was striving to reform kids from the lower caste converting them from Shudras to Brahmins by teaching them Vedas. While it is a welcome step, it doesn’t help solve the problem of hierarchy. The word “reform” suggests that Brahmins > Shudras and those kids should be apologetic towards them being Shudras earlier. This superiority complex is unfortunately there in many so-called upper castes. Don’t know how many Brahmins would like to do the work of Shudras or would be willing to be converted to Shudras! Even amongst the lower castes, there is constant infighting on which caste is superior over the other. The hierarchy has been set in over hundreds of years, which makes even the original interpretation of caste system unthinkable.

We may think that the times are changing and people are beginning to move over caste. But even today there are several instances of discrimination at workplace. Lower caste people even resort to hiding their surnames to avoid exploitation. Poor lower caste people are susceptible to be converted to Christianity or Islam for money. Some Christian and Muslim elite also encourage the caste system as it helps them to develop ethnic superiority over these lover caste converts as well. I won’t support the missionaries who convert them but one can’t blame the people who get converted if their life improves financially by being converted. Organizations like Bajrang Dal and VHP would do better to concentrate on achieving equality of castes so that the lower caste people don’t fall prey to conversions than targeting these missionaries. The missionaries at least do a good job providing high quality education. I have done all my schooling in a missionary school and I am certainly proud of it.

Reservations seem to be a necessary evil today but is not a permanent solution and cannot be allowed to exist forever. The effectiveness of reservations can be questioned on whether it really goes to the needy and also whether it helps to improve their social class. Politicians thrive on caste-based vote-bank politics and will never allow the current caste system to go away from India. But instead of always blaming the politicians and the social system, think about yourself first whether you have been casteist in any way. The society being free from casteism, where there are no “upper” or “lower” castes seems to be a utopian world now! But we can make individual efforts to mitigate the effects of casteism in the Indian society by not being casteist ourselves. This will certainly help weaken the argument for reservations so that it can be eliminated once and for all. Maybe not today, but our future generations may not have to fill their caste in school forms. Till then people will be born in India, either to rule or to be ruled.

12 comments:

  1. i like d last line d most.....pple in india cannot afford to complain because it is their attitude which is ruling them nd leading them to disparity.....

    ReplyDelete
  2. hmm again a gud one... waise ob padh liya kya poora (fm to padhega nahi)

    ReplyDelete
  3. a bold stance for sure. good writing.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "Only meritocracy should be followed”.

    Adam Smith always supported the idea of meritocracy. Well he was one of the most confused person of his times, that is why while all his life he tried to promote Laissez Faire free market capitalism, he ended up being a socialist economist supporting statist government system.
    Meritocracy is as dangerous as reservation because of the complete governmental control over education boards.


    But I do agree with the last part of your write up and just like the first commenter, I liked the last line.
    But it is not the problem of Indian Individuals if they want to be free, it is the problem of collectivists.

    Have a read here to understand why it is a philosophical problem and what is necessary to get rid of it.
    India In search of freedom Equality and Justice

    Anyways, reservation in simple terms is cheating.
    And I do agree that the anti reservation activists are hypocrites.
    here you may take a look over my view on it
    Hypocrisy of Anti-Reservation Activists

    Also, the habit of cheating being inculcated in Indian students is also a problem similar to reservation.
    here i wrote about it Exam-Cheats, the Indian students under scrutiny.


    Oops I am sorry if my comment seems to be a spam with lots of links attached, but since the topic is so much related, i felt an urge to share my ideas and articles about the topic with you too.

    Thanks for the good post.
    Unpretentious Diva!
    Reason For Liberty

    ReplyDelete
  5. hey vaibhav, nice post...few things i would like to point out.
    1) You touched on the linguistic reservation in the institutes in Mumbai, what i would like to point out is that all such institutes/organisations (as far as i know) are private ones, they do not rely on public(government) funds to run themselves. They are run by trusts set up and managed by philantrophists from linguistic background X and hence feel the need to reserve the seats for that particular bacground. As such it is unfair to them that you compare their reservation of seats to that undertaken by the government. Although i do think that these institutes are still wrong in having reservations, (after all charity, if selective, is actually an investment) anywho...it is not fair to criticize them.
    2) I think as long as there are lakhs and lakhs of people (quite a few of whom are equally meritorious, after all one exam is not enough to define merit) appearing for exams like CAT, it is difficult to ensure an even distribution of oppurtunity. Ofcourse caste based reservation is probably the worst method we could have chosen. Some time back i had enlisted a few of my ideas on this It maybe a good read in this context. http://saurabhsays.blogspot.com/2006/11/deservation-for-reservation.html

    ReplyDelete
  6. @Unpretentious Diva
    [i]Oops I am sorry if my comment seems to be a spam with lots of links attached, but since the topic is so much related, i felt an urge to share my ideas and articles about the topic with you too.[/i]

    Thanks for sharing. Went through your site, quite an interesting read I must say.

    ReplyDelete
  7. @Saurabh
    about the points you mentioned

    1) The private institutes in Mumbai have lingistic quotas because the Indian Constitution has a provision allowing reservations for linguistic minorities in unaided colleges. As long as the Indian Constitution allows it, the philantrophists are well within their rights to have these quotas to serve their community.

    However my point of emphasis was not on the colleges that have these quotas but the people who make use of them to take admission when they have underperformed, and also shout slogans like "Reservations should be banned". They question the Indian Constitution on caste-based reservation but forget that the same Indian Constitution is giving them reservations. Though principly even I am against this increase in reservations but the truly meritorious will manage to find higher education in good institutes despite this increase. Maybe not their first choice, but their next choice. Those who don't get anywhere take help of linguistic quotas and then cry about quotas based on caste and need for meritocracy. If one wants to protest against reservations, protest for the right reasons without showing double standards. This is why I brought in the comparison with linguistic quotas.

    2) Niice post. Your ideas are nice, but again the question comes about the implementation. The ruling of the Supreme Court about excluding the higher income group was also a good idea if only the government was in the same wavelength. I wonder whether rural/urban criterion could be implemented. How does one prevent people from claiming a rural domicile just for the sake of reservations! AIEEE had state quotas till this year, when it was abolished. That time people used to change their domicile and do their boards from states with much lower ranks. But certainly if implemented well, it would be a farer form of reservations just like the one by the Supreme Court.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Thanks for sharing. Went through your site, quite an interesting read I must say.

    Ohh thanks, but I was hoping for some comments too [:p] hehe.

    Anyways, I would like to know your views about Sarv Shiksha Andolan.

    Please do read these posts--

    Education For All

    And Education, Is it a fundamental right? and please convey your views after reading...

    I will be waiting to see how you respond, and whether you understand the reason and essence of it.

    Thanks again
    Unpretentious Diva!

    ReasonForLiberty

    ReplyDelete
  9. Very logically analysed, my man. Caste gets people to get carried away, so often.

    ReplyDelete
  10. very impressive.. we ingnore somethings totally. it will take years to completely eradicate casteism as ppl still use it as their identity

    ReplyDelete
  11. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete